I. P. J. v. StateI. P. J. v. State
Two petitions for delinquency were filed against appellant, one charging appellant with prowling and the second alleging appellant had violated his community control by (1) being arrested for prowling, and (2) failing to make restitution as required. The juvenile division of the circuit court found the charges to be true and adjudicated appellant delinquent. We reverse.
The State established only that appellant was on a city sidewalk in a commercial area of Jacksonville at two o’clock in the morning. This evidence fails to meet the standards set forth for a prowling conviction in State v. Ecker,
The order is REVERSED.