Hyland v. Wonder, 127 F.3d 1135

The opinion in the above-entitled case, filed June 25, 1997, is amended as follows:

At Slip op. pg. 7353 [117 F.3d at 411, left column, second full paragraph], at the end of the paragraph numbered [3], change the to a “,” and add “and the Navy officer had qualified immunity.” Delete the following sentence at the start of the next paragraph, “That analysis applies here.”

At Slip op. pg. 7355 [117 F.3d at 412, left column, second full paragraph], on the second line of the runover paragraph, change the words “found a First Amendment violation on” to “applied a first amendment analysis to.”

With the opinion thus amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thompson has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judges Sneed and Boochever so recommend. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Case Details

Case Name: Hyland v. Wonder

Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Published: Oct 6, 1997

Citations: 127 F.3d 1135; 1997 WL 613647; No. 95-15533

Docket Number: No. 95-15533

Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.