Case Information
*1 Case 2:24-cv-00863-DAK Document 23 Filed 05/21/25 PageID.3369 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH KIMBERLY H., ORDER AFFIRMING & ADOPTING
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:24-CV-863-DAK-DBP v.
Judge Dale A. Kimball FRANK BISIGNANO,
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant.
This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball, who then referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 29, 2025, Magistrate Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21], recommending that the court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Review of Agency Action [ECF No. 12].
The Report and Recommendation notified Plaintiff that any objection to the Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed.
A Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is subject to de novo review by this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the record de novo and agrees with Magistrate Judge Pead’s analysis and recommendations in their entirety. The Commissioner of the Social Security’s *2 Case 2:24-cv-00863-DAK Document 23 Filed 05/21/25 PageID.3370 Page 2 of 2
decision is supported by substantial evidence. The court, therefore, adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation as the Order of the court. Accordingly, the court affirms the Commissioner of the Social Security’s decision and denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Review of Agency Action [ECF No. 11].
DATED this 21st day of May 2025.
BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2
