62 So. 2d 837 | La. | 1953
On August 8, 1952, defendant moved to-dismiss this appeal, contending that appellant (plaintiff) perfected a previous appeal under the first of two orders obtained by her and then failed to bring up the transcript timely (the present appeal is under the second order). In denying the motion: on November 10, 1952, 221 La. 1088, 61 So. 2d 881, we observed in the opinion supporting our decree that mover’s position would be meritorious if bond had been furnished in connection with the first order, pointing-out that the record before us did not disclose that such was done.
The appeal is dismissed.