History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hyde v. Boyle
86 Cal. 352
Cal.
1890
Check Treatment
The Court.

—The petition in this case purports to be one for leave to prove an exception, under section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure; but it is really a petition to remodel a bill of exceptions, settled and signed by the judge of the trial court, by striking out certain things therein contained. The power of this court in the premises is discussed in Landers v. Landers, 82 Cal. 480, and other cases. The duty and power of settling statements and bills of exceptions rest generally and properly in the judge of the trial court. This court can interfere with such statement or bill only in the cases provided by statute; and the only case thus provided is found in said section 652. But that section-refers only to a case where the judge has “ refused to allow an exception.” It does not give this court jurisdiction to remodel a bill of exceptions generally, by striking matter out of it, etc., as is prayed for in this petition. The power of this court must be confined within the limits prescribed by the code. The petition is denied.

*353Paterson, J., concurred in the order denying the petition.

Thornton J., and Works, J., did not participate in the decision.

Rehearing denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Hyde v. Boyle
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 7, 1890
Citation: 86 Cal. 352
Docket Number: No. 13876
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.