History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hyde v. Anderson
112 A.D. 76
N.Y. App. Div.
1906
Check Treatment
Gaynor, J.:

The order should be reversed and the motion granted. The judgment was unauthorized ; judgment may not be entered for costs allowed on a motion (Code Civ. Proc. § 779). Moreover, the order of discontinuance should not have been absolute, as it was. It could only impose the costs as a condition of discontinuance, and then the plaintiff would have been free to pay the costs and discontinue, or go on with the action.

Order reversed with costs and disbursements, and motion, granted with costs.

Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Hyde v. Anderson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 22, 1906
Citation: 112 A.D. 76
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.