History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hutchinson v. Exton
53 N.J. Eq. 688
N.J.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith, Talman — 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Hutchinson v. Exton
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 15, 1895
Citation: 53 N.J. Eq. 688
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.