8 La. App. 134 | La. Ct. App. | 1928
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him for the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note bearing eight percent per annum interest', sustaining a conservatory writ issued, under which a piano was seized, and recognizing a vendor’s privilege on the property seized, and plaintiff filed an answer to the appeal more than three days before the cause was fixed for argument, praying that damages be assessed against appellant as for a frivolous appeal.
Th.e only appearance made by defendant in the trial court before judgment was a motion to dissolve the sequestration on the face of the pleadings, which was overruled; and the judgment appears to have been rendered on confirmation of a default, and defendant has not appeared here to urge his appeal.
The motion to dissolve the writ was correctly overruled, and in default of any note of evidence or statement of fact appearing in the record, we presume there was evidence offered sufficient to warrant the judgment (National Park Bank vs.
In view o.f the fact that the judgment bears eight percent per annum interest, as stipulated in the note sued upon, the damages will be fixed at five percent rather than the maximum provided by law (Art. 907, C. P. Southern Hardwood & Woodstock Co. vs. Seven Eleven Auto Co., 1 La. App. 316; Hicks vs. Bell, 1 La. App. 563; Mossman vs. Lynch, Orl. App. Teiss. Dig. App. 20).
The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed with five percent on the principal amount of the judgment as damages for frivolous appeal, and at defendant’s cost.
