History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huston v. Regn
184 Pa. 419
Pa.
1898
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Huston v. Regn
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 17, 1898
Citation: 184 Pa. 419
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 187
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.