124 F.R.D. 614 | W.D. Tenn. | 1989
ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’- SECOND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
The defendant Coyne Cylinder Company has filed a motion to strike the Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Admissions which was filed on January 5, 1989. Defendant contends that the request was not filed timely since it was filed only 15 days prior to January 20,1989, which is the date imposed by the United States Magistrate in the modified Rule 16(b) scheduling order for the conclusion of all discovery. Defendant
“Requests for admissions are not a general discovery device.” Misco, Inc. ¶. United States Steel Corp., 784 F.2d 198, 205 (6th Cir.1986); 8 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2253, at 706 (1970). The purpose of a request for admissions generally is not to discover additional information concerning the subject of the request, but to force the opposing party to formally admit the truth of certain facts, thus allowing the requesting party to avoid potential problems of proof.
The court therefore considers the motion to strike Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Admissions not to be well taken and denies same.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
. Among potential problems are witness unavailability or inconvenience, increased expense, additional trial time, and difficulty of persuasion among others.