History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hurley v. Jones
165 Pa. 34
Pa.
1894
Check Treatment
Pee Cukiam,

The defendant’s point was properly refused by the learned court below. This was not a condemnation proceeding, but an ordinary action of trespass for injury to the plaintiff’s close. The plaintiff was entitled to recover any actual damages he suffered by reason of the trespass of the defendant, and he complained of the destruction of his vegetables and his fences. Any advantage to the lot by reason of the fill is not a proper subject of consideration.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hurley v. Jones
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 12, 1894
Citation: 165 Pa. 34
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 242
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.