| Cal. | Jul 1, 1858

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J., concurring.

In this case, there was no such actual and continued change in the possession of the property, under plaintiffs’ purchase, as to take the case out of the operation of the Statute of Frauds. It remained in charge of the same person, at the same place, and was used in the same manner after as before such purchase.

Judgment affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.