History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huntington v. Davidson
12 N.E.2d 453
NY
1937
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The affirmance is on the ground that the Statute of Limitations has run against the claim. The court does not pass on any other question. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. *Page 513

Case Details

Case Name: Huntington v. Davidson
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 16, 1937
Citation: 12 N.E.2d 453
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.