151 Me. 365 | Me. | 1956
This was an action to recover the balance claimed to be due arising out of the sale of potatoes. The case is before us on defendant’s exceptions to the admission of evidence and to the refusal of the presiding justice to direct a verdict for the defendant. The case has twice been tried and on each occasion an Aroostook County jury has found for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff was a potato grower and the defendant a potato buyer. Plaintiff had a large quantity of potatoes in storage which he offered to sell to defendant. They went to
The plaintiff’s wife was permitted over objection to use her record book to refresh her recollection as to the “pickers’ count.” In Hunter v. Totman, 146 Me. 259, we reviewed the first trial of this same case. In the course of the first trial
The entry will be
Exceptions overruled.