History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunter v. Hunter
10 A.D.2d 937
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1960
|
Check Treatment

-Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, so as to stay the action until the termination of the separation suit between the parties. Where a determination in one action will dispose of the controversy in another, the latter should be stayed (3 CarmodyWait, New York Practice, p. 36). A judgment in the wife’s favor in the separation suit would dispose of all the issues raised in this action (Garvin v. Garvin, 306 N. Y. 118; Presbrey v. Presbrey, 6- A D 2d 477, affd. 8 N Y 2d 797). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunter v. Hunter
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 24, 1960
Citation: 10 A.D.2d 937
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.