History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Winkel
55 Iowa 623
Iowa
1881
Check Treatment
Rothrook, J.

r vbactice : pleading.' The plaintiff does not complain that the written agreement in question is unconscionable, nor that it is in any respect illegal and not binding upon him. Upon the contrary he bases his right to the possession of the machine upon the contract. By its terms he had not the right of possession, and could maintain no action therefor without a tender of the amount due thei’eon. Having failed to allege such tender, the demurrer to the petition should have been sustained.

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Winkel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Apr 7, 1881
Citation: 55 Iowa 623
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.