History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Tinkham
21 Ill. 639
Ill.
1859
Check Treatment
Caton, C. J.

The court properly overruled the motion to change the venue. No notice of the motion was given, and the statute positively requires a notice. It is a misapprehension to say that here no notice could have been given. It is certain that at least one day’s notice, could have been given, for the affidavit is made the day before the motion, and there is no excuse shown why notice was not given as the statute required.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Tinkham
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1859
Citation: 21 Ill. 639
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.