History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Stevens
25 N.C. 365
N.C.
1843
Check Treatment
Daniel, J.

We think the. opinion of the court below correct. It has been repeatedly deecided that money in the hands of a sheriff, raised by execution, or moneys in the hands of a clerk of a court by virtue of his office cannot be attached. Alston & Co. v Clay, 2 Hay. 171. Overton v Hill, 1 Mur. 47. The court, and not these officers, is the *366proper judge to whom such moneys belong. The judgment must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Stevens
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 15, 1843
Citation: 25 N.C. 365
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.