History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission
265 Mich. 241
Mich.
1933
Check Treatment

Plaintiffs applied to the Michigan public utilities commission for a renewal of permit as a freight carrier, tendering a fee of $13.64, one-twelfth of the annual fee, being for one mouth from September 18 to October 17, 1933, when the repeal of Act No. 312, Pub. Acts 1931, would take effect.

That sum being refused and the sum of $130.16, the fee for a year, being demanded by the commission that sum was paid under protest and a petition was filed for mandamus. *Page 242

An order to show cause was allowed and the commission answered that it advised plaintiff that it was necessary to file an application for a license for one year and based its action on the provisions of section 5 of Act No. 312, Pub. Acts 1931, under which fees may be pro-rated and credited.

A mandamus and writ of prohibition is denied.

POTTER, SHARPE, and FEAD, JJ., concurred with WEADOCK, J. McDONALD, C.J., and NORTH, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred in the result.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 2, 1933
Citation: 265 Mich. 241
Docket Number: Calendar 37,462
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.