History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Laconia & Lakeport Street Railway
39 A. 437
| N.H. | 1896
|
Check Treatment

The pledge of the stock was a pledge of the dividends accruing on it during the continuance of the pledge, and gave the pledgee the legal title to both alike. Savings Bank v. Marshall, ante, p. 417, and authorities cited.

Upon the facts appearing in the case, the payment of the dividends to the pledgor was without legal justification, and affords no bar to the plaintiff's recovery.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Laconia & Lakeport Street Railway
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1896
Citation: 39 A. 437
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.