History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Church
73 N.Y. 615
NY
1878
Check Treatment

Agree to affirm on opinion of Special Term.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

A motion was subsequently made for a reargument, on the ground that a point was omitted on the argument which would have been fatal to the judgment, to wit: That the action was against the representatives of a deceased surety upon a joint obligation, and that his estate was not liable. The court denied the motion, on the ground that if a reargument was had it would be upon the original record, in which there was no exception raising the point; and so, it could not be considered.

The case of Risley v. Brown (67 N. Y., 160), distinguished; as there, a motion was made to revive the action against the personal representatives of a deceased defendant, which motion was opposed on the ground presented here, and the question was fairly before the court on the motion.

All concur.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Church
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 23, 1878
Citation: 73 N.Y. 615
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.