History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hunt v. Burk
22 Ga. 129
Ga.
1857
Check Treatment

By the Court.

McDonald, J.

delivering the opinion.

If the plaintiff had a right to recover back the money from the defendant on the assignment of the printing contract, it Avas on the ground that that contract Avas illegal, as the assignment imposed no liability on the assignor, but was sim*131ply a transfer of the claim. There is no proof of fraud in. the sale, and by the agreed evidence in the case, it was without liability on the part of the assignor. The right of action accrued to the plaintiff immediately on the payment of the money, if the contract was illegal, it being on that hypothesis alone, that he could be liable at all. To this action the statute bar is four years, and that time having run, the right of action was barred at the time the suit was instituted..

Judgment, affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hunt v. Burk
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 15, 1857
Citation: 22 Ga. 129
Docket Number: No. 34
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.