Humphrey v. State

May 18, 1989
No. 88-908
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Orfinger
ORFINGER, Judge.

Points for “legal constraint” were improperly scored in computing ‍​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‍appellant’s recommended guidelines sentence, because nothing in the record before this court supports the trial court’s conclusion that ‍​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‍at the time of appellant’s arrest here there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest on a charge ‍​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‍of contempt for “failure to appear for a criminal judicial proceeding.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)6. Because the elimination of these points ‍​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‍reduces the recommended sentence, we vacate the sentence and remand the case for recalculation of the scoresheet and ‍​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‍for resentencing.

Sentence VACATED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.