Humphrey v. Eakeley
74 N.J.L. 599
N.J.
1907
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

The judgment brought here by this writ óf error is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court, reported in 43 Vroom 425.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Eeed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14.

For reversal — None.