midpage

Hughes v. StateHughes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jan 24, 1978
No. 77-1111
Reporters:
Before:
Bark
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion. The motion ‍‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‍was correctly denied. See: Clements v. State, 320 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), wherein the following is found:

sfc S}C * ifc * S(!
“ * * * Relief from a judgment of ‍‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‍conviction under Rule 3.850 is not proper where the ground raised was presented on appeal or was properly presentable thereon. Reinard v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 88; Koedatich v. State, Fla. App.1974, 287 So.2d 738; Jenkins ‍‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‍v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 886.”
% ¡‡: ¡j« sf: ü:

The appellant had a full appeal upon his conviction. The issues presented by the 3.850 petition either were ‍‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‍or could have been presented in his appeal in chief, which was affirmed in Hughes v. State, 272 So.2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied Fla., 282 So.2d ‍‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‍877. Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hughes v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 24, 1978
Citations: 354 So. 2d 130; No. 77-1111
Docket Number: No. 77-1111
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In