History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hughes v. State
160 Tex. Crim. 114
Tex. Crim. App.
1954
Check Treatment
BELCHER, Judge.

The former appeal of this case, Hughes v. State, 262 S.W. 2d 508, was dismissed because no sentence appeared to have been pronounced against appellant.

This record shows that sentence was pronounced upon appellant while the above appeal was pending in this court. The trial court is without authority to enter a sentence during the pendency of an appeal. Therefore, no legal sentence appearing in the record, it is the duty of this court to again dismiss the appeal. LeBove v. State, 146 Texas Cr. R. 157, 172 S.W. 2d 342, and authorities therein cited.

After this appeal has become final, the trial court would be authorized to enter the proper sentence. Art. 828, C.C.P.; Art. 772, C.C.P.; Hinman v. State, 54 Texas Cr. R. 434, 113 S.W. 280.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Hughes v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 12, 1954
Citation: 160 Tex. Crim. 114
Docket Number: No. 26,965
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.