History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
170 N.E. 132
| NY | 1929
|
Check Treatment

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence sufficient to present a question of fact for the jury; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Dissenting: KELLOGG, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 22, 1929
Citation: 170 N.E. 132
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.