midpage

Huffman v. StateHuffman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 14, 1978
77-182
Versions:360 So. 2d 1045

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant‘s contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Huffman v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jul 14, 1978
Citations: 360 So. 2d 1045; 77-182
Docket Number: 77-182
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In