Huff v. StateHuff v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Broyles
Broyles, P. J.
W. A. Dampier, for plaintiff in error.
W. A. Wooten, solicitor-general, contra.
1. It dоes nоt aррeаr that thе triаl judgе аbused his disсretiоn in ovеrruling thе motion for а continuanсe bаsed upоn the аbsеnce of сеrtаin witnеssеs whо did ‘nоt residе in the county where the case was pending.
2.’ The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed..
Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concu/r.