History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huested v. Richmond Light & Railroad
141 N.Y.S. 1124
N.Y. App. Div.
1913
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented an issue which should have been submitted to the jury. . Jenks, P. J., Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirsehberg and Burr, JJ., voted to modify the judgment by striking out the words “ upon the merits,” and to affirm the judgment as so modified, without costs. ' ;

Case Details

Case Name: Huested v. Richmond Light & Railroad
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 15, 1913
Citation: 141 N.Y.S. 1124
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.