8 Ohio 120 | Ohio | 1837
delivered the opinion of the court:
The acknowledgment of the deed, although slovenly, is well enough. It admits no sensible interpretation, except that which shows the essential requisites of the law were complied with.
It is not intended now to decide, whether a judgment, against a married woman, entered upon her written acknowledgment of ■service, and agreement to waive error, be void or voidable. The reversal of the judgment in scire facias renders it unnecessary at this time.
The demurrant principally relies upon,the new rights, acquired by the sale. Without denying that the judgment of restitution on the reversal, restores the plaintiff, in most respects, to her original situation, he insists that the act regulating judgments and •executions, 29 Stat. 107, sec. 22, which declares that the reversal
Decree permitting redemption of lands, in the hands of Broad-well’s heirs.