HSM REAL ESTATE, INC., Respondent, v KASHA DRAGON, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
March 8, 2011
941 N.Y.S.2d 512
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“Generally, a buyer who breaches a contract by applying for a mortgage loan greater than the one required under the express terms of the contract is not entitled to recover his down payment” (Marx v Shustek, 226 AD2d 351, 352 [1996]; cf. Gorgoglione v Gillenson, 47 AD3d 472 [2008]).
The plaintiff seller established, prima facie, that the defendant purchaser breached the parties’ contract for the sale of real property by applying for a mortgage loan in the sum of $455,000, an amount that exceeded the provision in the parties’ contract requiring the defendant to secure a mortgage loan in the amount of $400,000 (see Humbert v Allen, 89 AD3d 804, 807 [2011]; Post v Mengoni, 198 AD2d 487 [1993]; Silva v Celella, 153 AD2d 847 [1989]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff‘s motion for summary judgment on the complaint.
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Balkin, J.P., Belen, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
