230 N.W. 269 | Minn. | 1930
1. The order denying the motion for amended findings is not appealable. Nash v. Kirschoff,
2. The order so far as it denied a new trial is appealable. No ground for a new trial was stated in the motion. No question of law is raised, and the order must be affirmed. Clark v. C. N. Nelson Lbr. Co.
3. The defendant moved for leave to file a supplemental answer. This motion was granted. The order granting it is not appealable. See Stromme v. Rieck,
There is left for trial such issues as may be raised by the supplemental answer and the pleading thereto. If judgment is entered either party may appeal and such questions as our practice permits may be raised on the record now here or as it may be after the trial upon the issues raised by the supplemental answer. See 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed.) § 386, et seq.
Order denying new trial affirmed; otherwise appeal dismissed. *95