History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoyt v. Gelston & Schenck
8 Johns. 179
| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1811
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The cause in the district court has been unnecessarily delayed on the part of the public prosecutor ; for the officers of the United States may, in case of the sickness of the judge of the district court, remove the cause into the circuit court. An indefinite imparlance, therefore, is unreasonable, and ought not to be granted.

Further time to plead was, however, given, on the motion of the defendant’s counsel, until the 1st July next.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoyt v. Gelston & Schenck
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1811
Citation: 8 Johns. 179
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.