Hoyt v. Gelston
15 Johns. 221
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1818
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This court cannot pronounce any new judgment in this case. It can only carry into effect the judgment of the supreme court of the United States. In the computation of interest, therefore, the taxing officer must not go beyond the time of the judgment of affirmance, that being *222the last act of the court above. The practice, in this respect, in our state courts, is regulated by statute, which cannot apply.to this case.