History
  • No items yet
midpage
Howell v. Edwards
89 N.J.L. 713
N.J.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenchard, Bergen, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER,. JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Case Details

Case Name: Howell v. Edwards
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 20, 1916
Citation: 89 N.J.L. 713
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.