77 N.Y.S. 957 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1902
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
The action was brought to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s buildings by fire. The property was at II Carey street, in the city of Buffalo, N. Y., and was leased by plaintiff to defendant to-be used as a-livery for mobile station carriages. The lease was in writing and was set out in the complaint in full. Among other provisions therein contained was the following: “ The Mobile Co. agree to conform to the Eire Underwriters’ rules as to the stor
It was claimed by the defendant that these allegations were irrelevant and redundant; that the defendant was aggrieved thereby, and that they should, therefore, be stricken out under section 545, Code of Civil Procedure.
Relief of this kind rests largely in the discretion of the court, and should be granted only when it is evident that if denied the moving party will be aggrieved by the allegation remaining in the pleading.
It does not appear by the pleading whether the agreements referred to in these allegations were in writing or by parol. If in writing they could certainly be proved on the trial, having been made at the same time as the lease, and having been alleged in the complaint. Possibly they could be proven if by parol. It can be more satisfactorily determined on the trial whether the agreements
Whether the agreements were within the rules of the fire underwriters and so covered by the lease will depend upon whether there were any rules and what they were. The plaintiff alleged there were rules and sets out the nature thereof.
The defendant may concede there were rules and that they are ■correctly set out in the complaint, or it may controvert the allegations of the complaint with reference thereto. Then the issues so raised can only he determined upon the trial. If the agreements in question go beyond the rules as finally established, we see no reason why they might not be relied upon in whole or in part as a basis of plaintiff’s right of action, especially if in writing. While technically it. might he said that the allegations, if immaterial, would if allowed to remain in the complaint aggrieve the defendant, yet we think, under the circumstances, the court very properly denied the motion to strike them out, and the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Adams, P. J., McLennan, Spring and Hiscock, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.