History
  • No items yet
midpage
Howard HABER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. T. KLASSEN Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
540 F.2d 220
6th Cir.
1976
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the question of whether white federal employees may bring suit for racial discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16.

The plaintiff-appellant is a white male postal service employee who claims that he was denied assignment to a position because of his race, in favor of a less qualified Negro applicant. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that “white persons may not rely upon Title VII in seeking relief for racial discrimination.”

The defendants-appellees concede that the decision of the District Court must be reversed under authority of the opinion of the Supreme Court in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.,-U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 2574, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976).

This appeal is before the Court pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 3(e). The Court concludes, pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 9, 1 that clear error requires reversal of the summary judgment of the District Court.

Reversed and remanded.

Notes

1

. Whenever a panel of this Court reviewing an appeal under procedures initiated under Rules 3, 8 or 9 concludes that clear error requires reversal or vacation of a judgment or order of the District Court or remand for additional proceedings in the District Court the panel may enter an appropriate order to accomplish this result.

Case Details

Case Name: Howard HABER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. T. KLASSEN Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 15, 1976
Citation: 540 F.2d 220
Docket Number: 75-2158
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In