Houston v. Schluntz
208 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App.
1968
Check Treatment
BAILES, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Attaway et ux. v. Schluntz et al., La.App., 208 So.2d 332, the judgment of the trial court rejecting the demands *336of the plaintiff, Ralph D. Houston, individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor son, James F. Houston, against E. K. Schluntz and his public liability insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, is affirmed at his cost.

Affirmed.