History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hough v. State
788 So. 2d 1009
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Lawrence Hough’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice for Hough to file a timely and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea should Hough have the grounds to do so. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hough v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 2, 2001
Citation: 788 So. 2d 1009
Docket Number: No. 2D00-4396
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.