History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hotchkiss v. Chevaillier
12 Tex. 224
Tex.
1854
Check Treatment
Wheeler, J.

We are of opinion that the Court did not err in giving judgment for the defendant in the certiorari, for the amount remaining due upon the Justice’s judgment. Having obtained cognizance of the case, it was proper for the Court to adjudicate upon the rights of the parties, and to carry its judgment into execution, without remanding the case to the Justice for that purpose. And to enable the Court to award execution, it was necessary to render judgment for the debt.

But in awarding costs, the judgment does not conform to the statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 716.1 The judgment must therefore he reversed, and such judgment be here rendered as the District Court should have rendered.

Reversed and re-formed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hotchkiss v. Chevaillier
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1854
Citation: 12 Tex. 224
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.