midpage

Hossman v. StateHossman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals
Apr 1, 1985
No. 4-684A155
Reporters:
,
Before:
Conover

OPINION ON REHEARING

CONOVER, Judge.

The State of Indiana has filed a Petition ‍​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍for Rehearing which correctly points out our statement the defendant was acquitted of the burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary charges is ‍​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍incorrect. In fact, the jury hung as to these charges. According ly, we have corrected this error by amending our original statement ‍​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍of facts in this regard. 473 N.E.2d 1059 (Ind.App.1985).

This amendment does not, however, lead to a contrary result. Given a hung jury, it is ‍​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍patently obvious the evidence was insufficient for the conviction of Hossman as to those two charges.

Excepting the above, the Petition for Rehearing ‍​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍is in all other respects denied.

MILLER, P.J., and YOUNG, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hossman v. State
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 1, 1985
Citations: 475 N.E.2d 1197; 1985 Ind. App. LEXIS 2302; No. 4-684A155
Docket Number: No. 4-684A155
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
Log In