Horton v. StateHorton v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Anstead
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction for purchasing cocaine near a school. See Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990). We reverse appellant’s conviction for possession of the same cocaine and remand for resen-tencing on the purchasing offense alone. See West v. State, 573 So.2d 404, (Fla. 4th DCA, 1991).
ANSTEAD, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.