Horton v. State
123 Ga. 145 | Ga. | 1905
1. It is not error to allow a witness to deliver his testimony in narrative form, without the aid of questions from counsel, when counsel so request, provided the witness is not permitted to state anything which is inadmissible as evidence. This practice is rather to be commended than condemned.
2. The evidence, although circumstantial, and not entirely satisfactory, was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and the discretion of the judge, exercised in overruling the certiorari, will not be controlled.
3. There was no error requiring a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.