midpage

Horton v. SmithHorton v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 9, 1980
Versions:51 N.Y.2d 798
412 N.E.2d 1318
433 N.Y.S.2d 92
1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2658

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the police officer’s testimony as to the point of impact was "without objection on the part of plaintiff”.

When a timely objection is not made, the testimony offered is presumed to have been unobjectionable and any alleged error considered waived. (CPLR 4017; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 4017.05, at pp 40-87 to 40-88.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Horton v. Smith
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 9, 1980
Citations: 51 N.Y.2d 798; 412 N.E.2d 1318; 433 N.Y.S.2d 92; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2658
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In