History
  • No items yet
midpage
Horseman v. Hare
98-2264
4th Cir.
Dec 29, 1998
Check Treatment

*1 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arnold Horseman, Jr., Patty Jean Horseman, Appellants Pro Se. Gary Raymond Greenblatt, MEHLMAN & GREENBLATT, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Arnold Horseman and Patty Jean Horseman appeal from the district court’s orders (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying their discharge in bankruptcy and (2) dismissing their ap- peal of the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside a fraudulent conveyance. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Horseman v. Hare, Nos. CA-98-1252-AMD; CA-98-1412-AMD; BK-95-3127-SD; AP-96-5-023-SD (D. Md. June 19 & July 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Horseman v. Hare
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 29, 1998
Docket Number: 98-2264
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.