Horseman v. Hare

98-2264 | 4th Cir. | Dec 29, 1998

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2264 In Re: JAMES ARNOLD HORSEMAN, JR.; In Re: PATTY JEAN HORSEMAN, Debtors. _________________________ JAMES ARNOLD HORSEMAN, JR.; PATTY JEAN HORSEMAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and LORRAINE M. HORSEMAN, Plaintiff, versus CONSTANCE M. HARE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1252-AMD, CA-98-1412-AMD, BK-95-3127-SD, AP-96-5-023-SD) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 29, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Arnold Horseman, Jr., Patty Jean Horseman, Appellants Pro Se. Gary Raymond Greenblatt, MEHLMAN & GREENBLATT, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Arnold Horseman and Patty Jean Horseman appeal from the district court’s orders (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying their discharge in bankruptcy and (2) dismissing their ap- peal of the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside a fraudulent conveyance. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Horseman v. Hare, Nos. CA-98-1252-AMD; CA-98-1412-AMD; BK-95-3127-SD; AP-96-5-023-SD (D. Md. June 19 & July 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2