History
  • No items yet
midpage
Horn v. Talmage
8 N.J. Eq. 108
New York Court of Chancery
1849
Check Treatment
The Chancellor.

I think the injunction should not he continued. If the complainants have rights which will he violated by any proposed action of the defendants, or either of them, they are rights for the violation of which a remedy at law may be had. The nature or extent of the injury sought to be prevented by injunction are not such as should induce this Court to interpose by injunction.

Without expressing any opinion, therefore, as to the strict legal rights of the parties, I think the case, as developed by the bill and answer, is such as should, in the discretion which the Court of Chancery exercises in reference to injunctions, determine the Court to leave the parties to their legal remedies, if they have any.

Injunction dissolved.

Case Details

Case Name: Horn v. Talmage
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Dec 15, 1849
Citation: 8 N.J. Eq. 108
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.