163 So. 535 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1935
Action by appellee, the purchaser, against appellant, the baker and seller, for negligence in selling the purchaser bread or cake containing particles of glass.
While the case, in its legal aspects, seems to be governed by, and the trial to have been conducted in accordance with, the law as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Collins Baking Co. v. Savage,
Appellant's "argument" for error, on the rulings "assigned" as error, does not, to our minds, rise to any greater degree of sufficiency than that held to be inadequate in our opinion in the case of Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. Smalley,
We believe we ought to say that appellant's learned counsel is not, even by indirection, criticized by what we have just written. It is perhaps true that he said as much by way of "argument" as could be said conscientiously.
But, finding no ruling presented for our decision, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.