72 N.J.L. 168 | N.J. | 1905
Pending- a writ of error to review a judgment of this court the execution issued on the judgment was returned satisfied. Afterwards a remittitur from the Court of Errors and Appeals was filed showing an award to the plaintiff of costs in the Court of Errors and Appeals. Thereupon the plaintiff issued an alias fieri facias commanding the sheriff to make the amount of the judgment rendered in this court, but endorsed with a direction to levy that amount, and also the costs on error.
This was manifestly improper, and the writ must be set .aside, with costs of this motion.
The statute (Gen. Stat., p. 1457) authorizes the collection of those costs by execution, and the writ issues out of this court merely because the Court of Errors and Appeals does not issue such writs.
The suggestion respecting the quantum of “double costs” is disposed of by the decision in Mairs v. Sparks, 2 South. *513. See, also, Shields v. Lozier, 5 Vroom 530. “Double costs,” in our practice, means twice the amount of ordinary costs.