History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank
138 N.E. 497
NY
1923
Check Treatment
*39 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225 N. Y. 633.)

His cock, Ch. J.', Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 30, 1923
Citation: 138 N.E. 497
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.